Ex-FBI agent Peter Strzok, who was referenced in Special Counsel John Durham’s report Monday, argued that it exhibited “bias” and “never should have” been made.
After four years of research, Durham’s 316-page report found that the FBI investigation into Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign for Russia collusion had a “lack of analytical rigor, apparent confirmation bias, and an over-willingness to rely on information from individuals connected to political opponents.”
Despite this, Strzok insisted on MSNBC’s “The ReidOut” that Durham’s investigation “didn’t come up with anything” and “never should have taken place.”
Although Strzok accused Durham of being influenced by bias, Strzok himself was previously fired from the FBI after perceived bias against Trump during the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation. In 2018, multiple anti-Trump texts from Strzok were discovered from 2016. One of the texts showed Strzok asserting to former FBI lawyer Lisa Page that “we won’t allow” Trump to become president.
Read more at Foxnews.com
What Are Your Thoughts?
